Monday, February 02, 2009

Abundant Grace

Two years ago, I had a couple posts about how Iain Murray helped me find a good church in Goiânia, Brazil, and how through that church, we got back in touch with a young woman (also named "Grace") who had first welcomed Elsiene to Grace Community Church.

Iain Murray is the founder of Banner of Truth Trust, one of the most trusted publishers among the books we carry at Grace Books International. Iain Murray was assistant to Dr. Martyn Lloyd-Jones at Westminster Chapel, London, in the 1950s, is a minister in the Australian Presbyterian Church, and is one of today's foremost biographers.

Yesterday, February 1, marked 40 years that John MacArthur has served as our pastor at Grace Community Church, and Iain Murray was our guest preacher, bringing a sermon from Colossians 1:27, "To them God chose to make known how great among the Gentiles are the riches of the glory of this mystery, which is Christ in you, the hope of glory."

I had thought it would be fun to meet Iain Murray, but I was serving with the bookstore most of the day. For the 40th anniversary Grace To You published a book of landmark sermons from the preaching of John MacArthur's forty years of ministry, entitled Truth Endures. Included with the book is a 70-page biographical sketch of John MacArthur's life, written by Iain Murray. We received 4000 copies of the book to give one to each family or household as a gift. We blew out of those by 12:30 pm, and could have used about 1000 more.

As we were down to the last box, one of the pastoral assistants came to me and asked, "Do you have any more books? I need two copies to give to Iain Murray."

I gave the young man two books, grabbed a third copy for myself, scooped up Nathanael (who was playing around my feet) and followed around behind the church where Iain Murray was waiting to be whisked away in a car by Phil Johnson, director of Grace To You. I thanked Iain Murray for having directed me to the church in Goiânia, and he signed my copy of Truth Endures, saying, "Not many people know Goiânia!"

It was a great day, from start to finish, and I am grateful for how God continues to bless me and my family at Grace Community Church and The Master's Seminary. It is rare to see a man who has served God faithfully in one pulpit for 40 years, and the effect of that faithfullness will be felt for many years to come, I'm sure.

And I'm tickled by God's providence, even in the small things. He certainly didn't have to let me meet Iain Murray, and I wouldn't have even recollected if the day had passed without it. But God put me in the right place at the right time to enjoy the blessing. I guess that's an example of God's grace: God didn't have to show favor...

but He did.

Friday, January 09, 2009

Under the Wing

News flash:
Starting May 21st, 2009 DELTA AIRLINES will start NON STOP service from Los Angeles to Sao Paulo International Airport in Brazil.


Los Angeles to Sao Paulo - Tuesdays, Thursdays and Sundays.

Sao Paulo to Los Angeles - Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays.

And to introduce their new connection Delta was offering LAX-GRU round trip tickets for $450. Bummer that that offer expired four days ago, and I've already committed my 100,000 miles on United for our tickets in April.

But next time around...!!!

More info here:
http://news.delta.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=11199

Sunday, December 21, 2008

Overheard in the church parking lot...

Three young men leave the college-age fellowship group at noon on a Sunday, not too long ago.

Two of them are conversing about a "sister" within their circle of friends who has apparently impressed them both.

The first young man suggests to his friend, "Maybe we should have hand-to-hand combat to see who gets to go out with her!"

"No," the friend replies, "we should have hand-to-hand prayer to see who gets to go out with her."

At this the third companion butts in, "Tell you what. You guys go pray, and I'll go out with her."

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

On Obama and denying one's self

A guest at this blog recently read my review of The Faith of Barack Obama, and made the following comment:
I read and reviewed this book, too (thanks for the free book, TNP!), and I had mixed reactions like you did.

I'm interested in one thing you said about Obama's conversion coming "not because he was drawn to Christ" but because this church meshed with what he already believed.

I'm not sure it's as tidy as that. The way each of us comes to faith and experiences faith is conditioned largely on what we already bring to the table. In the case of many radical conversion stories it means rejecting much of what we brought to the table, while for Obama it was an affirmation of it. His church challenged him and made him grow, even if he didn't make a massive 180 degree turn in his life.

To assume, then, that he is not really a Christian, but a "spiritually awakened person" is, I think, boxing in the work of the Holy Spirit a little too much. God works in mysterious ways, and they very rarely fit in to our narrowly defined categories.
I responded in the comments, but I don't want this to get lost down there, so I'm promoting this to a new post.

Hello ________, thanks for stopping by to read my review of The Faith of Barack Obama.

While agreeing with you that God does not work with in our narrowly defined categories, I must affirm that God always works within the parameters He Himself sets in Scripture.

For example, I reference the words of Christ who said, “If anyone wishes to come after Me, he must deny himself” (Matt. 16:24; Luke 9:23). God works within those parameters. It would be foolish and arrogant, yea, heresy, for me to teach that one can come to Christ without denying himself.

Just this morning, I came across the full text of Obama's interview with Cathleen Falsani, from March 27, 2004, in which he describes his own faith. I highly recommend we all read it.

There is much I could say about the interview, but I'll just mention two points of concern:

1) Obama's prayer life is actually an internal dialog with himself; no mention of communion with God.

2) Obama's understanding of sin is anything that goes against his own values; no mention of sin as an offense to a Holy God.

Compare Obama's practice of prayer with the example of David in Psalm 5.

Give ear to my words, O LORD, consider my meditation. Hearken unto the voice of my cry, my King, and my God: for unto thee will I pray. My voice shalt thou hear in the morning, O LORD; in the morning will I direct my prayer unto thee, and will look up, (Ps 5:1-3, KJV).

Likewise, consider David's theology of sin found in his confession after committing adultery with Bathsheba and murdering her husband Uriah:

Have mercy upon me, O God, according to thy lovingkindness: according unto the multitude of thy tender mercies blot out my transgressions. Wash me thoroughly from mine iniquity, and cleanse me from my sin. For I acknowledge my transgressions: and my sin is ever before me. Against thee, thee only, have I sinned, and done this evil in thy sight: that thou mightest be justified when thou speakest, and be clear when thou judgest, (Ps 51:1-4, KJV).

Contrast the religion of David with Obama's brand of Christianity and it becomes apparent that the faith of Barack Obama is essentially quite Obama-centric, even when he's using it to serve others.

Obama will soon take the oath of office. He will be my president, and I will honor him as such, but I have no confidence in his profession of faith in Christ.

I pray that God will indeed grant Barack Obama repentance, the grace to deny himself and follow Christ.



Obama's interview with Cathleen Falsani may be read here:
http://blog.beliefnet.com/stevenwaldman/2008/11/obamas-interview-with-cathleen.html

Friday, November 14, 2008

Book Review: Basics of Verbal Aspect in Biblical Greek

Constantine R. Campbell. Basics of Verbal Aspect in Biblical Greek. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2008. 159pp. $16.99. Reviewed by Matthew Carroll.

Constantine R. Campbell’s Basics of Verbal Aspect in Biblical Greek, released just this month by Zondervan, is an accessible, affordable, and I believe, invaluable, introduction to the topic of verbal aspect.

I entered seminary with an undergraduate degree in engineering, and no knowledge of Greek aside from the letters of the alphabet my former vocation had appropriated to represent all manner of variables. At seminary, I took an intensive summer introduction to Greek grammar, followed by two semesters of Greek Exegesis. Looking back though, I can’t recall if I learned anything about aspect. So among Campbell’s readers, I consider myself among of the uninitiated.

For my benefit, Campbell responds first to the “So what?” question. Knowledge of verbal aspect is important because it enables one to correct exegetical falacies, not uncommon in commentaries. Positively, it allows one to understand why a particular verb may have been employed in Scripture over against another, opening up rich exegetical insights (11-16).

Campbell defines verbal aspect as the speaker’s or author’s viewpoint on the action of the verb, and holds that there are only two aspects, perfective and imperfective. In the perfective aspect, the speaker views the verb as a whole, in summary, from a distance, with no regard for the details. In the imperfective aspect, the speaker views the verb as if unfolding before his very eyes, with no regard for the beginning or end of the action. The classic example is that of a journalist reporting on a parade. Sitting in a helicopter far above the parade, the reporter would describe the event in the perfective aspect as a whole. Standing on the curb with the parade passing before his eyes, the same reporter would speak in the imperfective aspect of the details of the parade, with no reference to the beginning or end of the parade (19).

Campbell’s book is a necessary addition to our resources on Greek grammar because many of the most trusted works on biblical Greek confound aspect and Aktionart. Aspect is a semantic value built in to the tense-form of the verb, it does not change from one context to another. Aktionart, the “kind of action,” is a pragmatic value that arises from the aspect, the lexeme (the particular word) and the context, so the same verb, in the same tense, may involve a different Aktionart from one context to another (21-25).

Greek tense, Campbell argues, is not primarily a temporal quality as it is in English, but a spatial quality. In other words, speaking in summary of a remote event, the subject would use a verb with the aorist tense-form. The aorist tends therefore to be translated as a past tense in English, but since time is not the most important factor in tense, sometimes context requires us to translate an aorist verb in the present or the future.

The theory of verbal aspect, Campbell explains in Part 1 of his book, and in Part 2, he shows how this plays out in the New Testament text. Both parts of the book yielded a number of good “ah-ha!” moments for me. Campbell uses Luke 9:42-45 to give an example of how perfective and imperfective aspect are employed in narrative. In this case, aorist verbs are employed to provide the main structure of the narrative. The main events described are remote to the narrator, and are presented in summary; Jesus rebuked the demon and healed the boy. But the supplemental information is provided via the imperfect tense, which is similarly remote, but is able to convey unfolding events, in this passage, the people’s reaction to the healing and subsequent fear (44-5).

Campbell deals with each of the tense-forms according to an understanding of aspect in chapters 7 through 9, and then in chapter 10, he deals with participles. I have heard sermons (in fact, I have taught) on Matthew 28:19 that the imperative verb is make disciples, and that go is actually a participle that may be understood “as you are going.” Regarding this verse, Campbell explains how knowledge of aspect requires us to treat this participle as taking on the same imperative mood of make disciples.
“It would be a mistake to render this aorist participle ‘as you go,’ communicating an action that frames the context in which the command ‘make disciples’ is to take place. Instead, as a participle of attendant circumstance, the aorist takes on the full force of the imperative with which it is coordinate. The command is to go and make disciples” (127).
After finishing Constantine R. Campbell’s Basics of Verbal Aspect in Biblical Greek, I returned and reread Part 1 on Verbal Aspect Theory, and found I filled in a number of remaining gaps in my understanding of aspect. I recommend this book to any student of the Greek Testament, whether you already know the importance of aspect, whether you are looking for a way to freshen up a knowledge of Greek grammar that has grown rusty, or whether, like me, you don’t recall if you ever heard of this before. Basics of Verbal Aspect in Biblical Greek is an invaluable tool in your Greek study.



Campbell is blogging this week over at Koinonia. Read the blog to sample the content of his book:
[Post 1 of 5] [Post 2 of 5] [Post 3 of 5] [Post 4 of 5]
[Post 5 of 5]

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

Gnomic Aktionart

I am learning about gnomic Aktionart. As intriguing as that sounds, it actually has nothing to do with lawn ornaments.

Aktionart is a grammarian's way of describing what "kind of action" a verb describes in its context, whether a repetitive action, an action beginning, or a state of being, for example.

"Gnomic" is an adjective that describes some universal, timeless truth. So when James writes, "For the sun rises with its scorching heat and withers the grass; its flower falls, and its beauty perishes. So also will the rich man fade away in the midst of his pursuits" (James 1:11), he uses aorist verbs (for those of you interested in such things) which are ideally suited in their aspect for creating a gnomic Aktionart, expressing a general statement about reality.

Verbal "aspect" (since you asked) is a way of communicating the speaker's viewpoint upon the action. If the speaker describes the action as from a viewpoint spacially or temporally distant, he employs a perfective aspect. If he describes the action as unfolding right before his eyes, he employs an imperfective aspect.

Zondervan has just published Basics of Verbal Aspect in Biblical Greek, by Constantine Campbell. Constantine argues that classical and koine Greek actually did not employ tenses (past or present) as we do in English, but instead used aspect. When translating the Greek Testament in to English, we need to pay attention to aspect and context to determine what English tense to employ.

I'm something of a hobby linguist and Greek nerd, so I found this book fascinating. Russian language also uses aspect, so the concept in Greek was not completely foreign to me. All the same there were still some parts that left me scratching my head saying, "Huh?!?" Undoubtedly, that is no fault of Dr. Campbell's.

Shortly, I plan to post something more along the lines of a book review here on
Basics of Verbal Aspect in Biblical Greek, but for the moment, I merely wanted to gush about Greek grammar. It's the coolest evar!

Campbell is blogging this week about his book over at Koinonia.
[Post 1 of 5] [Post 2 of 5] [Post 3 of 5]

His book just happens to be available at Grace Books International.

Saturday, October 11, 2008

Unpacking Forgiveness

I received an early review copy of Unpacking Forgiveness (Crossway), by Chris Brauns, and have begun to read through it. I've got a number of other things going on, so I may not finish it quickly, but that may actually be for the better. This looks to be a very good book to take slowly.

Probably the first author I ever read to turn me on to the glory of God is John Piper. I came across a copy of Desiring God: Meditations of a Christian Hedonist in Uzbekistan in 2000. There Piper writes, "God is most glorified in us when we are most satisfied in Him."

In Unpacking Forgiveness, Chris Brauns starts by applying that principle to our understanding of forgiveness. Too many people are afraid to learn about biblical forgiveness thinking it will be a bitter pill to swallow. Not the case, says Brauns:
So why do it? Here is the short answer. You should be motivated to unpack forgiveness so you can know maximum happiness. When your alarm clock screeches at you to get out of bed at some desolate hour so you can get up to study the Bible and pray, you should listen to it because you want to be happy. When you contemplate calling up someone to ask forgiveness or to offer grace, perhaps someone to whom you never wanted to talk again, you should challenge yourself to do so because you want to be happy. When you are deciding whether or not to watch television or to learn prayerfully about forgiveness, tell yourself, I am going to do this because I believe it will maximize my happiness.
I never thought about forgiveness that way!

I look forward to much more to come in this little volume.